About Me

Name:Young Republican
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

My Faith, My Politics

                       

Many on the Christian Right get angry or tired when they hear how many believe religion should be out of politics. It's understandable because as a Christian you realize that your faith is your most important component, it forms you daily and the love we feel from God is so strong we want to follow him the best we can. That's how I feel at least. Whenever I talk with some of my atheist friends, I pity them because I know many things the first being that God exists. I also know how much he loves all of us and the life we lead after accepting God's love is nothing compared to the one before.

My faith is my life. I falter daily, and realize that while I can never get close to Christ's perfection that doesn't mean we don't try daily. With all of my strong feelings, beliefs and knowledge, I also know that America can only survive if we keep religion out of government. The reason for this is simple, every person's view of God is different and in order to allow the free will that God put us on this earth to enjoy and suffer with, free will must remain a component.

As a country that brags about being a beacon of light to the rest of the world for always giving it's citizens the most freedom and allowing them to fight for more, there is no freedom greater than freedom of religion. The right to practice my faith is one I like many others would be willing to die to protect. That right is what makes our country great.

So when some want to implement their faith into government, no matter how well intentioned it must be fought with every fiber of our being. We've seen what's happened when faith enters government in the lands of the Middle East, where rape victims are stoned by their fathers and brothers and where twisted ideology spews hatred in members of Westboro Baptist. We've also seen many more examples of the love a community has and how much good churches do daily across the country from my church to I suspect yours.

I want every one to know the love of Christ and to follow him daily, but it must be their choice neither mine nor the government. It is not the job of government to legislate immorality but protect the freedom to commit it as long as it does not infringe of the right's of other citizens. To this we can become a great Judean/Christian country by choice not by force and let faith be real not false.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Book Review: Barbara Bush- A Memoir

                       
I only have a few memories of Barbara Bush all of them good but it is funny how someone who so once dominated the headlines can disappear with nary a word later in life. Having found the time to read her memoir, it was a fun experience to step into the Bush 41 White House for a few days and meet a real terrific woman.

Barbara Bush: A Memoir is one of the best edited political autobiographies, avoid the usually pratfalls that doom many a reader. One always it seems starts page 1 hearing about how some famous person was born in a barn and how doing farm chores made them a better Senator. At that point, it becomes a better sleep aid than Advil PM. One suspects, Bush also one wanted to write about her childhood and young girlhood at length but the editor knew better. Her early life before meeting George Bush covers only 25 pages in a 532 page book. In it we learn everything we want and nothing we don't.

One suspects that Barbara Bush's memoir would be better than the former President himself (as he has never written one). He would have wanted to point out the political implications of this and the ramifications of that and overall it wouldn't have stood out some 13 years later. With the first lady's perspective you get to the social side of important meetings and conferences and realize the art to all these things. Of course President Bush had a very busy life from Special Envoy to China, Congressman, CIA Director, VP and President not to mention oil man. All of which let's us the reader meet some fascinating people who we only read about in history books.

Barbara Bush kids about her writing style and indeed she repeats some words more times than I care to count. Her tone is one of unrelenting politeness but you do get that famous "Barbara-chill" effect in certain passages. It's clear that like many children born into wealth she has no idea what it's like to struggle or suffer in terms of finances. And her most controversial statement in the book was when she criticizes a husband of an Army reservist who tells about how his family is suffering with the loss of income from his wife's regular job, in which she says she was offended over the statement because "they knew what they were getting into when they signed up". That may be true but I'd like to see Mrs. Bush's reaction in the former President was called up and she had to survive and a reservist pay. I don't say that with anger but her worldview in terms of economics is sheltered but not malicious.

We learn interesting things about her and the President and their views on certain issues. Such as the fact that she confirms that she is pro-choice (though conservative pro-choice) and for certain forms of gun control. She also confirms that the 92 convention was a disaster and that she and the President were very disturbed about the gay bashing that took place writing "It didn't represent George's views at all".

Her biggest flaw is the most common in political autobiographies especially female ones and that is the constant name dropping. It's not to inflate one self like so many do but instead to cover the party circuit and not make any waves in certain circles. Really though it's the fact that many women are taught from age 5 to always do their thank you notes. Overall the memoir is fun, enjoyable and informative. The best thing to be said for it is it's editing which makes the heavy book faster paced than one expects. *** Out of ****.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Yeah, The Oscars Got It Wrong

I've been meaning to post this but debated back and fourth about whether or not it was right on a political blog but part of the fun of blogging is get to know the blogger's personal taste and such. I've said before that I love going to the annual Oscar bash held in Southeastern Michigan. I have a blast, the food is great and it's always nice to meet new  people. I've been going with a friend of mine for years and every year it just get's better. So I written a few words on the five nominated even though the Oscars were like four months ago but whatever now all the films are out of DVD so go the store for your fav.
 
 5th place- Juno- Really enjoyable with wit and attitude that never seem in short supply. However the film never adds up to the greatness so many have attributed to it. It is simply a very good teen movie but not even the best of this decade in the genre. That would belong to "Mean Girls" and "Charlie Barlett" (which just came out on DVD).
 
 4th place- No Country for Old Men- A story about a border town, a suitcase of money, and what it means to be a man and survive. An constantly thrilling ride but it is not profound. A really good rollar coaster is still just a rollar coaster.
 
 3rd place Atonement- The movie that was suppose to win best picture but after people saw it said "not so much". It really is beautifully shot with excellent performances but it is cliched in terms of plot and brings nothing new to the screen.
 
 2nd place- Michael Clayton- The annual liberal picture of the year was one of the best. Evil companies + George Clooney = Oscars? However while excellent, the actual charchter of Clayton is wrongly written, he's the guy with all the answers but we as the audience know before him. Taldia Swenton is superb as the villan (and yes I called the Oscar for her.)
 
  1st place and true best picture winner- There Will Be Blood- We have seen nothing like this picture, this intensity, the Day-Lewis. He demands our attetion of the screen and we gladly give it. Actually knowing someone with Daniel's (the charchter's name not the actor) personality it showed a different type of man. Crazy but honorable in a crazy way. But the film really deserved the Oscar for the scenes between Eli (his foe in the film) and Daniel are so personal, funny and sad all at the same time all the way to the end with the immoratal words "I'm Done" you realize what you are seeing is a classic.
 
For all those who think the conservative critic won out in this selection, I'm afraid I have to add that my favorite film of 2007 was not nominated "Avenue Montiage" a french film with a lot of heart was the best of the bunch but do rent "There Will Be Blood".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Attack Pakistan And Chew Gum

My grandfather, the other one for long time readers, a die-hard FOX News addicted Republican, came from Florida to visit my family. When he was coming up our driveway, he picked up the family paper. Then he made the mistake of actually seeing which paper it was, "The New York Times" or as we call it in my sister and I call it "The Jew York Times". (Yes we are allowed to say it we look so perfectly Jewish so that has to count.) Anywho, my grandfather threw a temper tantrum and told me how my evil reading habits were ruining America and that I was wrong for supporting quote "that wicked paper". At that point, I went to work an hour and a half early and escaped to the breakroom, hoping for safety. I now know how every teenage boy must feel when his mother finds "Playboy" under his bed. I didn't have the heart to tell my grandfather I actually read the paper for the articles. The reason I subscribe to The Times is for it's foreign affairs coverage which are better than any other American new source. You are lucky if you get half a paragraph on the side bar on page 9A of your local paper about the evil's of Mugabe. In The Times you get an actual idea of what's going on and the implications it has for the world.
                                                               

Which brings me to the point of how angry I am at the current situation in Pakistan. Yesterday, 9 of our soliders were killed by the Taliban alongside the Afghanistan border. The enemies' base camp location? Pakistan. On the front page, side by side, The New York Times, had to articles to showcase the mockery of our anti-terrorism campaign in Pakistan.

You see, the Taliban have unfettered power, in the Ziarat region of Pakistan. Not only that but they have their own prisons, court system, oversight over the Marble industry, and collect taxes. Yes they are actually the tax collectors. When two Times reporters were held by the Taliban and then released, Pakistan then asked the reporters questions but not one of them pretain to the Taliban, their location, descriptions. It was apparently all old news.
To state the obvious, two organizations attacked us on 9/11 and only two. Al-Qaeda and the their major funders and protectors the Taliban. We have been told time and time again, that our enemies were hiding in caves cowering and broken. But now as the stories in The New York Times, illustrate they are actually running proviences in Pakistan. This isn't a missing person case, they are out in the open. The Times reporters kept running into one member of the taliban after another.
 
Why aren't we, America, with the greatest military in the world not killing those who killed us? It doesn't make sense. I support the Iraq War, the War In Afghanistan, and anything else that attacks the Islamic world but why aren't we killing those who actually enaged our response in the middle east. Our leaders, including President Bush need to answer to us these questions. Or even better, just kill them and let that be the answer. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Demon's Demise

In the constant book of history another page was turned when Jesse Helms died last week. And while I find no joy in his death, I also find no joy in his life. And a part of me is glad he can hate no more.
 
Whenever a big name in the political world passes on, the belt way lies through it's teeth and always fake praises the person giving them the term I described in one of my classes as "sainthood after death". Helms has been getting a little of it, with praise for his work as Chairman of the foreign realtions committee and his push for Africa AIDS research. But really he was a disgusting man.
 
His only accomplishment was that he found yet another group to hate. His bigotry knew no bounds. From his anti-semitism, racism, anti-female, twisted view of abortion, and of course his homophobia, the real question is Washington was who is Jesse going to hate next?
 
                                                 
 
His life is one of tragedy, a man who could feel good only when tearing others down. For every Helms out there, society has failed and allowed a monster to be created. To be sure he was good on taxes and supported a strong military but so do the vast majority of other Republicans. No, Jesse Helms wanted to be known as the Senator without a heart, and he will go down as such.
 
How does one get so twisted, so full of hate, and just plain meaness. Alot of the blame must go Senator Helm's parents who I'm sure raised their child to be such a revolting human being. Under certain circumstances any of us could have been him. But in every human, there is the ability to love and understand. Humanity and compassion can never die and we must bring it out at those times when we least want to.
 
Goodbye, Senator Helms. You can hurt no more.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (20) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Do We Want?

One of my favorite games as a child was and still is Monopoly. However as any die-hard Parker Brothers player can tell you the game can go on and on and on until someone just gives up. That is the situation we as the American voting public now face with Iraq. Going into Iraq got the support of the vast majority of Americans but now the same majority wants to leave. I really can't blame them.
 
War is a terrible thing and the stories of the young men and women we have lost are almost too much to hear let alone imagine the daily hell their lost inflicts on the lives of their families. If this war took the life of my brothers or sisters, I'd probably be protesting it with everything that I've got. You have to have something to blame might as well be George W. Bush.
 
But with all that said many people simply want President Bush to answer this one very simple question. What is winning? We want to win but let us know what it is. It doesn't have to include timelines and deadlines to help the enemy just tell us what we need to achieve in Iraq for the vast majority of our troops to come home.
 
America has been in this game of "War" for five years only it isn't a game and the pieces we are losing are the best of this generation. We want to win so let us. Tell us what to do. Give us the direction we need to support and get the support of the American public. And while this war belongs to President Bush it belongs to all of us, every one who calls themselves an American.
 
And for our next Commander in Chief, either Barack Obama or John McCain, they will have accepted the challenge to write the ending of this war for our history books. And while blaming President Bush is all fine and good in a debate, the true impact of what they decide will have real world consequences that you don't poll on. Obama has already said he wants to get out and doesn't care about winning. John McCain has said he wants to get out but slower than Obama and cares about winning but hasn't articulated what that is.
 
If he doesn't he deserves to lose. And don't take that for meaning Obama deserves to win. We have serious problems in this country the biggest being a war that will have ending. The question is which one?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »